Universities have become frequent targets for cybercriminals because they hold large volumes of sensitive data, including student records, research material and financial information, while often operating with decentralized IT systems and thousands of staff and student accounts. Guidance of this kind typically covers recognizing phishing attempts, using strong and unique passwords, enabling multi-factor authentication, and reporting suspicious emails or activity promptly to IT security teams rather than ignoring or forwarding them internally.

Why the Advisory Reflects a Broader Global Pattern

While the Ohio University notice is specific to its own campus community, it mirrors a pattern being addressed by organizations well beyond the education sector. Human error remains one of the most commonly cited factors in successful cyberattacks worldwide, and institutions of all kinds — from universities to corporations and government agencies — have increasingly turned to employee-focused awareness campaigns as a frontline defense, alongside technical safeguards such as firewalls and endpoint protection.

This dynamic is closely watched in the UAE and wider Gulf region, where cybersecurity has become a strategic priority as governments and businesses accelerate digital transformation. The UAE has invested heavily in national cybersecurity infrastructure and public awareness campaigns, with authorities regularly urging both public and private sector employees to follow basic digital hygiene practices similar to those outlined in the Ohio University guidance: verifying the authenticity of emails, avoiding reuse of passwords across platforms, and using multi-factor authentication wherever possible.

GCC universities and academic institutions, many of which host large numbers of international students and maintain research partnerships with US and European universities, face comparable exposure to phishing campaigns and credential-based attacks. Cybersecurity officials in the region have noted that academic networks are attractive targets precisely because they combine valuable data with large, diverse user bases that are harder to fully secure through technical controls alone.

For organizations across the Gulf, the Ohio University advisory serves as a reminder that cybersecurity awareness is not limited to IT departments but extends to every employee with network access. Analysts tracking regional cyber risk have pointed out that as UAE and GCC entities continue to digitize services in banking, energy, healthcare and education, the human element — staff recognizing and reporting suspicious activity — remains as critical to overall security posture as firewalls, encryption or intrusion detection systems.

Cybersecurity specialists generally recommend that employees, whether in the United States or the Gulf, treat unexpected emails and links with caution, confirm requests for sensitive information through verified channels, and keep software and devices updated. As attacks grow more sophisticated, institutions on both sides of the world are converging on the same conclusion: technology alone cannot fully protect an organization without informed and vigilant employees.

The post University Guidance Highlights Everyday Cyber Risks first appeared on T&I News.

Building automation systems control critical functions such as heating, ventilation and air conditioning, access control, lighting and energy management. Unlike conventional IT networks, these systems often run on legacy equipment, use specialized protocols and cannot easily be patched or taken offline for updates, making them a distinct challenge for security teams. NIST’s advisory acknowledges that many operators managing these systems are not cybersecurity specialists and may be responsible for security alongside a range of other facility management duties.

Rather than proposing a comprehensive security framework requiring significant investment, the guidance emphasizes actionable steps that smaller operators can realistically adopt. This reflects a broader recognition within the OT security community that one-size-fits-all frameworks, while thorough, are often impractical for organizations with constrained staffing and financial resources. By focusing on achievable measures, NIST aims to raise the baseline level of protection across a sector that has historically lagged behind traditional IT in cybersecurity maturity.

Why the guidance matters for Gulf facilities

Building automation systems have become integral to commercial towers, hospitality venues, and government facilities across the UAE and wider GCC region, where large-scale developments increasingly rely on connected systems to manage energy consumption, security access and climate control. As these systems become more networked and integrated with broader IT infrastructure, they also become more exposed to cyber threats that could disrupt operations or serve as an entry point into wider corporate networks.

Facility operators in the region managing HVAC, access control and energy systems face many of the same resource constraints highlighted in the NIST guidance, particularly among smaller property management firms and facilities teams that may not have specialized OT security expertise on staff. The practical, low-barrier approach outlined by NIST offers a template that regional operators could adapt, even without adopting the full advisory as formal policy.

The publication also arrives amid a broader regional push to strengthen industrial and operational technology security. Gulf governments and critical infrastructure operators have been increasing scrutiny of OT environments, recognizing that building systems, utilities and industrial control networks represent an expanding attack surface as digitization accelerates across sectors including energy, transportation and real estate.

While the NIST guidance is a U.S. government publication and not a regional mandate, its focus on practical, resource-conscious steps aligns with challenges facing many building operators internationally, including in the GCC. Cybersecurity specialists tracking OT threats have consistently pointed to building automation systems as an under-protected category of infrastructure, given their operational importance and the tendency for security investment to lag behind that of traditional enterprise IT systems.

The advisory adds to a growing body of guidance from standards bodies and industry groups seeking to close this gap, offering operators with limited resources a starting point for reducing risk without requiring extensive new investment or specialized personnel.

The post NIST guidance targets under-resourced building operators first appeared on T&I News.

Modern highways increasingly depend on networked technology to manage traffic flow, monitor road conditions and communicate with vehicles equipped with connected or autonomous driving features. That connectivity, while improving efficiency and safety in normal operation, also creates new entry points for malicious actors seeking to disrupt traffic systems, manipulate sensor data or interfere with the operation of critical infrastructure. The initiative described in the report positions AI as a tool for identifying such threats before they can cause physical-world disruption, effectively bridging the gap between software-based security operations and hardware embedded along physical road corridors.

Why Smart-Highway Security Matters for the Gulf

While the project itself has not been detailed with specific institutional partners, technical architecture or deployment timelines in available reporting, the underlying concern is directly relevant to the Gulf region. UAE and Saudi Arabia have both made large-scale investments in smart transportation infrastructure as part of broader smart city and digital economy strategies, including connected traffic management systems, intelligent signage and early-stage autonomous vehicle trials in urban and highway settings. As these systems expand, so does the potential attack surface for cyber threats targeting transportation networks.

Highway and transport authorities across the GCC have in recent years prioritized digitization of mobility infrastructure, from sensor-equipped smart corridors to integrated traffic operation centers designed to reduce congestion and improve road safety. Cybersecurity officials in the region have separately flagged critical infrastructure, including transportation systems, as a priority area for protection amid rising global rates of infrastructure-targeted cyberattacks. A successful model for using AI to detect and respond to intrusions in highway systems could offer a template applicable to Gulf smart-city programs, many of which similarly rely on networked sensors and automated control systems to manage traffic and public safety functions.

Industry observers note that as vehicles themselves become more connected — through telematics, over-the-air software updates and vehicle-to-infrastructure communication — the security of the surrounding road network becomes as important as the security of the vehicles. A compromised traffic signal system, sensor network or highway monitoring platform could, in theory, be exploited to cause real-world safety incidents rather than simply data theft, raising the stakes compared with conventional IT breaches.

The reported use of artificial intelligence in this context points to a growing trend of applying machine learning techniques to detect anomalies in real time across large, distributed physical infrastructure networks, rather than relying solely on traditional perimeter-based cybersecurity defenses. Such approaches are increasingly used in sectors like energy and utilities, and their extension to transportation infrastructure reflects the convergence of operational technology and cybersecurity disciplines.

Further technical details about the specific AI models, funding sources or pilot deployment locations tied to the project were not immediately available. As smart transportation initiatives continue to expand globally and within the Gulf, however, the intersection of artificial intelligence and infrastructure security is expected to remain a focus area for both researchers and regional planners seeking to protect increasingly digitized road networks.

The post AI-Driven Effort Targets Growing Cyber Risks in Connected Highway Systems first appeared on T&I News.

This mismatch has made medium-sized firms an efficient target for criminal groups seeking a reliable return on the effort required to breach a network, encrypt systems and extort a payment. Analysts tracking the trend note that attackers appear to be calibrating their targeting strategies to firms that can plausibly afford a ransom demand but cannot easily absorb prolonged downtime or the cost of rebuilding trust with clients after an incident.

The consequences of a successful attack extend well beyond the immediate technical disruption. When a mid-sized supplier, logistics provider, financial services firm or technology vendor is hit, the fallout frequently spills over into its relationships with the customers and partners that depend on it. Missed deliverables, delayed transactions, exposed data and service outages can prompt clients to reconsider contracts, demand compensation, or shift business to competitors seen as more resilient. For companies that operate as links in larger supply chains, a single ransomware event can therefore trigger a chain reaction of commercial consequences that outlasts the technical remediation itself.

Relevance for the Gulf’s Growing Mid-Market Sector

The trend carries direct implications for the UAE and wider Gulf region, where a large and expanding base of medium-sized enterprises underpins sectors such as logistics, trade, construction, financial services and technology. As Gulf economies diversify and digitise under national transformation agendas, mid-sized firms are increasingly integrated into regional and global supply chains, often serving as vendors or service providers to larger government entities, banks and multinational corporations operating in the UAE and Saudi Arabia.

That integration raises the stakes of any ransomware incident affecting a Gulf-based mid-market company, since disruption can ripple outward to the larger organisations and public-sector clients that rely on them for critical services. Regional regulators, including UAE authorities overseeing critical infrastructure and financial services, have in recent years pushed for stronger baseline cybersecurity requirements across supply chains, reflecting concerns that smaller and mid-sized partners can represent a weak link even when anchor institutions maintain robust defences.

Cybersecurity practitioners in the region have repeatedly emphasised that mid-sized firms frequently underinvest in areas such as network segmentation, offline backups, employee awareness training and incident-response planning compared with larger enterprises, leaving them exposed to the same tactics — phishing, exploitation of unpatched software, and credential theft — that ransomware groups use globally. Given the commercial sensitivity of many Gulf business relationships, where trust and long-term contracts underpin sectors like real estate, trade finance and logistics, the reputational cost of a breach can be as damaging as the ransom demand itself.

Industry observers suggest that mid-sized companies in the UAE and broader GCC can reduce their exposure by treating cybersecurity as a shared responsibility across their client and partner networks, rather than an isolated internal cost. This includes adopting recognised security frameworks, conducting regular resilience testing, and communicating transparently with customers when incidents occur, an approach seen as critical to preserving the client trust that ransomware attacks most directly threaten. As the region’s mid-market continues to grow in economic importance, its cybersecurity posture is likely to remain under closer scrutiny from both regulators and business partners alike.

The post Mid-Sized Businesses Emerge as Preferred Ransomware Targets first appeared on T&I News.

Training large language models requires vast computing infrastructure, enormous datasets, and long-running processes that can span data centers operated by cloud partners. Any interruption to these runs, particularly one driven by security considerations rather than technical or scheduling issues, points to the growing recognition across the AI industry that the systems underpinning model development are themselves attractive targets for malicious actors.

While specifics of the vulnerability or threat that prompted the pause have not been detailed publicly, the decision to halt training rather than continue operating reflects a cautious posture increasingly common among major AI labs. Training runs can involve proprietary model weights, sensitive datasets, and specialized hardware configurations, all of which represent potential points of compromise if adequate safeguards are not in place. A breach at any stage of this pipeline could expose intellectual property worth billions of dollars or allow bad actors to tamper with a model before it is ever deployed.

Wider Implications for AI Security Standards

The reported pause arrives at a moment when governments, enterprises, and AI developers are under mounting pressure to demonstrate that frontier AI systems are being built with security as a core requirement rather than an afterthought. Regulators in multiple jurisdictions have signaled intent to scrutinize how leading AI companies protect their models, training data, and infrastructure from cyber intrusion, insider threats, and supply-chain risks.

For an industry racing to deploy ever-larger and more capable models, incidents like this serve as a reminder that operational security cannot be separated from the broader conversation about AI safety. A compromised training run could, in theory, introduce integrity issues into a model long before it reaches the public, making early-stage security controls as critical as the safeguards applied after deployment.

The episode also underscores the resource and reputational stakes involved. Pausing active training runs is costly, given the computing power and time invested in each cycle, suggesting that the security concerns involved were considered serious enough to warrant a deliberate slowdown rather than a quiet, in-progress fix.

For the Gulf region, where governments and sovereign investment vehicles have made substantial commitments to artificial intelligence infrastructure and where firms across the UAE and wider GCC are integrating generative AI tools into finance, energy, and public-sector operations, developments like this carry direct relevance. The UAE has positioned itself as a regional hub for AI investment and adoption, with national strategies aimed at embedding AI capabilities across government services and private industry. As Gulf-based enterprises increasingly rely on foundation models developed by companies such as OpenAI, any disruption or security lapse at the source has downstream implications for regional users, from enterprise customers to government partners exploring AI-driven initiatives.

Cybersecurity officials and technology leaders in the region have repeatedly stressed that AI adoption must be paired with equally rigorous security frameworks, particularly as GCC governments push forward with ambitious digital transformation agendas. Incidents involving major AI providers, even when details remain limited, reinforce the case for regional organizations to demand transparency from vendors regarding how models are trained, secured, and monitored throughout their lifecycle.

OpenAI has not issued detailed public comment beyond what has been reported, and it remains unclear how long the pause will last or which specific projects were affected. TAI News will continue to monitor developments as further details emerge from OpenAI or independent security researchers.

The post OpenAI Reportedly Halts Certain AI Training Runs Over Security Concerns first appeared on T&I News.

At the core of the proposal is a requirement that legacy systems underpinning the grid be upgraded to withstand decryption techniques that quantum machines are expected to eventually perform with relative ease. Cryptographic protocols that have secured digital infrastructure for decades rely on mathematical problems that are extremely difficult for classical computers to solve. Sufficiently powerful quantum computers are expected to solve many of these problems far faster, rendering some existing safeguards obsolete. The legislation seeks to get ahead of that shift by pushing utilities and infrastructure operators toward quantum-resistant alternatives before the technology matures to a threatening level.

Supporters of the bill point to timeline concerns as the primary driver of urgency. Experts have cautioned that cryptographically relevant quantum computers could materialize within the next decade, a window that leaves limited time for utilities to inventory vulnerable systems, replace outdated encryption, and test new protections across sprawling and often decades-old grid infrastructure. The concern is compounded by the fact that adversaries could already be harvesting encrypted grid data today with the intent of decrypting it once quantum capabilities become available, a tactic often referred to as “harvest now, decrypt later.”

The electric grid was singled out in the legislation because of its foundational role in national security and everyday economic activity. A successful cyberattack on grid operations could trigger cascading failures affecting hospitals, water systems, financial networks, and communications infrastructure, making it a priority target for both state and non-state threat actors. Lawmakers backing the bill argue that hardening the grid against quantum threats is not merely a technical upgrade but a matter of broader national resilience.

Implications Beyond U.S. Borders

While the bill contains no provisions specific to the Gulf region, its implications extend beyond American infrastructure. Utilities and industrial control operators worldwide face similar exposure to quantum-era cryptographic risks, particularly those running SCADA networks and interconnected power systems comparable to those found across GCC states.

Gulf countries have invested heavily in interconnected electricity grids, smart metering, and desalination facilities that depend on industrial control systems similar in architecture to those addressed in the U.S. legislation. As regional governments continue to expand digital infrastructure under national modernization strategies, cybersecurity officials and utility operators in the UAE and neighboring states may find it useful to track how quantum-resistant standards develop in the U.S. market, since such frameworks often influence international best practices and vendor product roadmaps.

Although no similar legislative measure has been announced within the GCC, the introduction of the U.S. bill signals a broader global recognition that quantum computing represents a long-term but serious risk to energy infrastructure. Analysts tracking critical infrastructure protection suggest that early awareness and gradual migration toward post-quantum encryption standards, rather than a rushed response once quantum capabilities arrive, will likely determine how well power networks worldwide withstand the next generation of cyber threats.

The post Bipartisan Push to Quantum-Proof the Grid first appeared on T&I News.

Genetic-testing firms hold a category of information that security experts consider uniquely sensitive because, unlike passwords or even financial details, DNA data cannot be changed or reissued once compromised. Depending on the scope of the intrusion, exposed records at such companies can include not only names and contact details but also health histories, ancestry results and raw genetic profiles submitted by customers seeking insight into their heritage or health risks.

The company has not detailed the full extent of the breach publicly, and it remains unclear how many patients were affected or over what period the unauthorized access occurred. Firms in this position typically face a review process to determine which categories of data were touched, a step regulators and affected individuals will be watching closely given the sensitivity of genetic information.

Regulatory and Industry Pressure Mounts

Breaches involving genetic-testing companies tend to draw heightened scrutiny from data protection regulators because such firms sit at the intersection of healthcare, consumer technology and biotechnology. Health-related data is subject to strict handling requirements in many jurisdictions, and incidents of this kind often trigger notification obligations to affected customers as well as potential regulatory inquiries into how the data was stored, encrypted and protected against unauthorized access.

The genetic-testing sector has expanded rapidly in recent years as consumer interest in ancestry tracing and personalized health insights has grown, creating large repositories of highly sensitive data that have become attractive targets for threat actors. Security researchers have repeatedly warned that companies handling genomic data need to apply the same rigor to cybersecurity as hospitals and health insurers, given the permanence and sensitivity of the information involved.

For audiences in the UAE and wider Gulf region, the incident carries relevance beyond the specific company involved. The GCC has been investing heavily in genomics and precision medicine initiatives as part of broader healthcare modernization efforts, with national genome programs and private diagnostic firms increasingly collecting genetic data from residents. Regional data protection frameworks, including the UAE’s federal personal data protection law and free-zone regimes such as those in the Dubai International Financial Centre and Abu Dhabi Global Market, impose obligations on organizations handling sensitive health and biometric information, mirroring the kind of scrutiny genetic-testing firms face elsewhere.

Cybersecurity professionals in the Gulf have flagged genomic and health data as a priority area for protection, given its growing collection through hospital networks, research institutions and consumer-facing testing services operating in the region. Incidents at international genetic-testing firms are often cited by regional regulators and industry bodies as cautionary examples when shaping guidance for local healthcare and biotech operators.

As investigations into the latest breach continue, affected individuals are expected to be notified in line with applicable data protection requirements, and the company is likely to face questions over the security measures it had in place to safeguard genetic and health records. The incident is expected to reinforce calls from security specialists for stronger encryption, access controls and monitoring across the genetic-testing industry worldwide.

The post Breach Exposes Sensitive Genetic Records first appeared on T&I News.

While detailed programming for the summit has not been made public, the initiative reflects a broader push within the U.S. Department of Energy’s national laboratory system to strengthen the resilience of nuclear facilities against evolving digital threats. INL, based in Idaho Falls, is a key federal research hub for advanced nuclear reactor development and has increasingly positioned itself as a center for cybersecurity research applied to critical energy infrastructure, including instrumentation, control systems, and grid-connected nuclear assets.

Cybersecurity for nuclear facilities has become an area of heightened concern globally as reactors and supporting infrastructure become more digitized and interconnected. Industrial control systems that manage plant operations, once largely isolated from external networks, are increasingly integrated with data systems that can be vulnerable to intrusion, ransomware, and other forms of cyberattack. Summits of this kind typically serve as venues for utilities, regulators, technology vendors, and national laboratories to exchange approaches to threat detection, incident response, and system hardening specific to nuclear environments.

Relevance for Gulf Nuclear and Energy Programs

Although the summit is being held in the United States and no Gulf participants have been confirmed, the subject matter carries indirect relevance for the region. The UAE operates the Barakah Nuclear Energy Plant, the Arab world’s first commercial nuclear power facility, which has been progressively bringing multiple reactor units online in recent years. As the plant’s operational footprint grows, so does the importance of robust cybersecurity protocols to protect its control systems, data networks, and connected infrastructure from external threats.

Saudi Arabia has also signaled ambitions to develop civilian nuclear power capacity as part of its broader energy diversification strategy, a move that would similarly require attention to cybersecurity frameworks governing nuclear infrastructure. As Gulf states expand their nuclear and advanced energy portfolios, international forums addressing best practices in nuclear cybersecurity, such as the one being convened by INL, are likely to inform standards and protocols that regional operators and regulators may eventually adopt or reference.

Cybersecurity cooperation between the United States and Gulf nations has expanded in recent years across sectors including energy, finance, and critical infrastructure, often through bilateral technical exchanges and shared regulatory frameworks. Nuclear-specific cybersecurity guidance developed at U.S. national laboratories has historically influenced international standards promoted by bodies such as the International Atomic Energy Agency, which Gulf nuclear regulators, including the UAE’s Federal Authority for Nuclear Regulation, also engage with.

Further details on the summit’s agenda, participating organizations, and specific resilience strategies to be discussed are expected to emerge closer to the event. TAI News will continue to monitor developments related to nuclear cybersecurity initiatives with potential relevance to the UAE and broader Gulf energy sector.

The post Idaho Lab to Convene Nuclear Sector on Cyber Resilience first appeared on T&I News.

The appointment reflects a broader trend among mid-size and regional US banks to build out specialized coverage teams focused on technology-driven industries, as cybersecurity spending continues to climb globally in response to escalating cyber threats, regulatory pressure, and the accelerating adoption of cloud and enterprise software platforms. Investment banks have increasingly sought bankers with sector-specific expertise to advise clients on mergers, acquisitions, capital raises, and strategic transactions within cybersecurity and infrastructure software, both of which have seen sustained deal activity in recent years.

Why Sector-Focused Banking Matters

Cybersecurity and infrastructure software have emerged as priority areas for investment banks seeking to capture deal flow from private equity firms, strategic acquirers, and growth-stage companies. As enterprises worldwide accelerate digital transformation efforts, demand for specialized advisory services covering software supply chains, cloud infrastructure, identity management, and threat detection technologies has grown correspondingly. Banks that build dedicated coverage teams in these verticals aim to position themselves as trusted advisors for founders and boards navigating an increasingly complex deal environment shaped by valuation resets, consolidation pressures, and evolving buyer appetite.

For audiences in the UAE and wider Gulf region, developments in global cybersecurity investment banking carry indirect but tangible relevance. The UAE has positioned itself as a regional hub for cybersecurity innovation and investment, with government-backed initiatives, sovereign wealth funds, and private equity players increasingly active in technology and software deals both domestically and internationally. Gulf-based investors have shown growing appetite for exposure to cybersecurity assets, whether through direct stakes in technology firms, participation in funding rounds, or partnerships with international financial institutions active in the sector.

As global banks deepen their sector expertise in cybersecurity and infrastructure software, GCC-based investment vehicles and corporates seeking cross-border opportunities may benefit from more sophisticated advisory relationships with institutions such as Citizens. Strengthened coverage teams at major lenders can translate into better-informed guidance for regional players evaluating acquisitions, partnerships, or capital deployment into the technology sector, an area of strategic priority under national diversification agendas across the Gulf.

While specific details of the transactions or clients that the newly appointed coverage lead will oversee were not disclosed, the appointment underscores the continued institutional focus on cybersecurity and software infrastructure as key growth verticals within investment banking. Industry observers note that such appointments typically precede expanded deal activity, as banks look to leverage specialized talent to originate and execute transactions in sectors experiencing sustained investor demand.

Citizens Financial Group, headquartered in the United States, has been expanding its investment banking practice in recent years, aligning with broader industry moves to compete for technology-sector mandates traditionally dominated by larger Wall Street institutions. The addition of specialized leadership in cybersecurity and infrastructure software signals the bank’s intent to deepen its footprint in a segment expected to remain a focal point for mergers, acquisitions, and capital markets activity in the period ahead.

The post Citizens Strengthens Investment Banking Coverage first appeared on T&I News.

Brockway joins with a track record described as spanning more than 125 deals, though the report did not detail the specific timeframe, transaction values or sectors involved in that deal count. His appointment adds a senior banker to Citizens’ technology investment banking franchise at a time when financial institutions across the United States have been building out specialized coverage teams focused on cybersecurity, a sector that has continued to attract elevated deal activity and investor interest even as broader technology dealmaking has fluctuated in recent years.

Citizens has been growing its investment banking division as part of a broader strategy to compete with larger Wall Street institutions for mid-market and growth-stage technology deals. Cybersecurity and infrastructure software have emerged as priority areas for many banks’ technology practices, given the steady demand from enterprises, governments and critical infrastructure operators for security tools, cloud infrastructure management and related software platforms.

Why the Hire Matters for the Sector

The appointment reflects a wider trend among banks strengthening specialized advisory teams to capture deal flow in cybersecurity, an industry that has remained resilient to economic headwinds because organizations continue to prioritize spending on data protection, threat detection and compliance. Investment banks that can offer deep sector expertise are positioning themselves to advise both strategic acquirers and private equity firms pursuing consolidation opportunities in a fragmented but fast-growing market.

For companies in the cybersecurity and infrastructure software space, access to bankers with extensive deal experience can be a determining factor when evaluating strategic options, including sale processes, capital raises or minority investments. Brockway’s mandate at Citizens will likely involve advising founders and boards of technology companies navigating these decisions, though the report did not specify further details on team structure, reporting lines or near-term deal targets.

While the announcement centers on the U.S. market, the broader dynamics it reflects carry relevance for the Gulf region as well. The UAE and wider GCC have positioned cybersecurity as a strategic priority, with government-backed initiatives and sovereign wealth funds increasingly active in backing security technology ventures and evaluating cross-border acquisitions. As global banks deepen their cybersecurity investment banking benches, Gulf-based investors and technology firms seeking international deal partners or acquisition targets may find an expanding pool of specialized advisory talent to draw on, even where a specific regional mandate has not been disclosed.

Further details on Brockway’s prior roles, the scope of his responsibilities at Citizens, and any planned expansion of the bank’s technology coverage team were not immediately available.

The post Citizens Expands Investment Banking Coverage first appeared on T&I News.